The Role of the IRS with Regard to a 1031 Exchange – Part 2: Sources of Authority
The Role of the IRS with Regard to a 1031 Exchange – Part 2: Sources of Authority
by Maura Snabes, Esq., CES, NTP
IRS Part 2: On what Does the IRS Rely When Challenging a 1031 Exchange?
In Part 1 of our series, we examined potential triggers that may prompt the IRS to audit a taxpayer who has completed a 1031 Exchange. In this installment, we turn our attention to the key sources and authorities upon which the IRS relies when evaluating the validity of a 1031 Exchange.
IRS Oversight and Audit Authority
The IRS is responsible for ensuring taxpayer compliance with Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code. As part of this oversight, the IRS conducts audits to determine whether taxpayers have adhered to the legal requirements for like-kind exchanges. During these examinations, the IRS scrutinizes:
The purpose is to assess whether the transaction qualifies as a valid 1031 Exchange under applicable tax law.
Primary IRS Sources of Authority in 1031 Exchange Evaluations
To guide both taxpayers and its own personnel, the IRS issues several types of official guidance. These include:
Revenue Procedures are official IRS statements published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin. They explain procedural guidelines affecting the rights and duties of taxpayers and are designed to promote uniform application of the tax laws.
Revenue Rulings are the IRS’s official interpretation of how tax laws apply to specific factual situations. They represent the IRS’s litigation position and are binding on the Service.
A PLR is a written determination issued to a specific taxpayer. It interprets how tax laws apply to the taxpayer’s particular transaction.
GLAMs are internal IRS documents providing authoritative legal advice to Service personnel on programmatic or industry-wide issues. They are signed by senior officials in the Office of Chief Counsel and are used to ensure consistency in legal interpretations and enforcement.
Judicial Interpretation: The Role of the Courts
The U.S. Tax Court
Judicial Status:
While not an Article III court, the Tax Court’s authority was affirmed by the U.S. Supreme Court in Freytag v. Commissioner, 501 U.S. 868 (1991), which held that the Tax Court exercises the judicial power of the United States and functions as a court of law.
Conclusion
When evaluating the legitimacy of a 1031 Exchange, the IRS relies on a combination of statutory authority, published guidance (Revenue Procedures and Rulings), taxpayer-specific determinations (PLRs), and internal legal opinions (GLAMs). Additionally, interpretations from the U.S. Tax Court and other federal courts shape and reinforce the boundaries of what qualifies as a valid like-kind exchange.
Understanding these sources is essential for any taxpayer or advisor involved in structuring or defending a 1031 Exchange.
.
CXS is a member of the Federation of Exchange Accommodators (FEA), the industry's leading professional trade organization.
Corporate Exchange Services handles forward, reverse, and improvement exchanges throughout the U.S.
Regardless of the transaction complexity, CXS has the expertise and personal approach needed to successfully complete even the most complex 1031 exchange.
Contact msnabes@corp1031.com to get started